holmesticemods: (Default)
[personal profile] holmesticemods posting in [community profile] holmestice
Thank you so much for another wonderful round of Holmestice! The mods want to say THANK YOU to all the creators who joined us for this round. You put in a lot of hard work and made some really great fanworks.

Reveals and the Master List go up on December 21st. Until then, please enjoy and comment on all the lovely fanworks. Creators, please do NOT respond to Dreamwidth comments or post your works elsewhere on the Internet until reveals go up in the community. You may of course reply to comments on AO3, which preserves your anonymity.

For anyone thinking of making a treat, we will accept treats right through until reveals, so if there's a prompt that inspires you, please have at it! Just use the regular submission guidelines and notify us at holmesticemods@gmail.com.

If you'd like to guess at who created what in this round, a list of all the contributors is below the cut. Go ahead and take a guess! It's all in good fun.



[personal profile] a_candle_for_sherlock
[personal profile] a_different_equation
[personal profile] alexcat
[personal profile] amindamazed
[personal profile] armchair_elvis
[personal profile] colebaltblue
[archiveofourown.org profile] Dovahlock221
[personal profile] dryadinthegrove
[personal profile] fridaythegowerstreetcat
[personal profile] gardnerhill
[personal profile] graycardinal
[personal profile] ireallyshouldbedrawing
[personal profile] iwantthatcoat
[archiveofourown.org profile] Keenir
[personal profile] luthienberen
[archiveofourown.org profile] Lyricoloratura
[personal profile] mercuryandmoonlight
[personal profile] mightymads
[personal profile] monkiainen
[personal profile] nahirholmes
[personal profile] natrix_natrix
Nobody / [archiveofourown.org profile] 0archangel0
[personal profile] nottoolateforthegame
[personal profile] oldshrewsburyian
[personal profile] penaltywaltz
[personal profile] rachelindeed
[profile] redpenrevolution
[archiveofourown.org profile] Reveling_in_mayhem
Robert / [archiveofourown.org profile] writemore
[personal profile] sanguinity
[personal profile] sanspatronymic
[personal profile] scfrankles
[personal profile] strampunch
[personal profile] tgarnsl
[personal profile] thefrenchweirdone
[personal profile] thesadchicken
[personal profile] trobadora
[archiveofourown.org profile] VTsuion
[personal profile] write_out



Go forth and leave love for your fellow Holmestice authors, artists, and vidders! See you again on the 21st, when we reveal who made what!

Guesses: Lightning Round #2

Date: 2019-12-20 10:51 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Shadow on asphalt (Default)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
Mary Russell

"Untold Stories" is a pretty direct answer to [personal profile] armchair_elvis' request...but a distinctly non-standard entry for most of our known resident Russell fans, in its open portrayal of a prior Holmes/Watson relationship (although it's a very interesting take on that relationship). Nor does the prose, for me, quite match any of the usual suspects. I think this is probably written by [personal profile] mercuryandmoonlight.

As to "The Apprentice's Beekeeper":

With [personal profile] scfrankles having laid this one at my own doorstep, I'm going to get in trouble no matter what I say here...and yet I can't leave a Russell story on the table without any sort of comment. Very well, then: The Supreme Commander is actually not wrong about the prose style - and therefore, very possibly not wrong that someone deliberately sought to mimic it. But like [personal profile] scfrankles, I hesitate to tag [personal profile] sanguinity for the piece. I have two reasons for this: (1) I am almost always wrong when I tag her for a story, no matter who's actually written it, and more importantly (2), the excuse given in the editor's notes is simply not believable if applied to [personal profile] sanguinity. I don't think there's a blackmailer alive who could force her to yield if challenged, and if she were the author, she wouldn't have suggested that there was. The next most logical suspect would be [someone who didn't actually sign up this round - oops], and I've already tagged [personal profile] armchair_elvis for a different work.

On balance -- and in part because of the interesting exchange between the mods in the comment-stream for this story -- I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that no matter whose account was used to submit "The Apprentice's Beekeeper", its author is exactly who the manuscript says it is: Sherlock Holmes himself. (Which leaves us, of course, with the potential reserve problem of which one of us might in fact be Holmes in electronic disguise. But that's a whole different guessing round....)

Miss Sherlock

On one hand, as [personal profile] scfrankles points out, [profile] mercuryinmoonlight is our only other formal volunteer for Miss Sherlock aside from its recipient. But we do have two or three folks among us (myself included) who like to stretch their muscles and work in fandoms for which they haven't necessarily tagged themselves in signups. (Also, as with a previous instance, I've already put in a different guess for [profile] mercuryinmoonlight.)

I think both [personal profile] iwantthatcoat and [personal profile] sanguinity are skillful enough to be plausible candidates for this one...and both of them are likewise devious enough to have mimicked the AO3 user-lock practice. (Come to that, [personal profile] scfrankles is also both clever enough and versatile enough to be a candidate, but I think they're also smart enough to have seen how much trouble I get into when I try to tag other people for my own stories, so that attribution won't work here.) The argument against [personal profile] sanguinity is that she normally uses a different dodge when posting stories whose authorship she wants to fog; the one against [personal profile] iwantthatcoat is that versatility notwithstanding, this particular sort of intimate character study isn't typical of their work.

On balance, and after much dithering, my guess for "A Lesson in Love" is [personal profile] sanguinity, because this is the sort of character piece that she does very well.
Edited Date: 2019-12-20 10:58 am (UTC)

Re: Guesses: Lightning Round #2

Date: 2019-12-21 06:47 pm (UTC)
sanguinity: woodcut by M.C. Escher, "Snakes" (Default)
From: [personal profile] sanguinity
You say the nicest things.

Re: Guesses: Lightning Round #2

Date: 2019-12-23 10:13 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Shadow on asphalt (Default)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
Awwww, shucks.

And at least I continue to be right about always being wrong when I tag you for something....

Re: Guesses: Lightning Round #2

Date: 2019-12-22 12:09 am (UTC)
iwantthatcoat: (Default)
From: [personal profile] iwantthatcoat
Thank you for calling me both skillful and devious ;)

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 03:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios