holmesticemods: (default)
[personal profile] holmesticemods posting in [community profile] holmestice
Title: Broken Silence
Recipient: [livejournal.com profile] meredydd
Author: [livejournal.com profile] graycardinal
Characters/Pairings: Mycroft Holmes, John Watson
Rating: G
Warnings: none
Summary:
I shook my head slightly, levered myself to my feet – and, for the first and only time since the founding of the Diogenes, broke the club’s most cardinal rule. “Come,” I said to Dr. Watson, “and we shall discuss the matter.”

Note: The following narrative appears to be taken from the private papers of Mycroft Holmes, but its true provenance is likely to be the subject of considerable debate among Holmesian scholars.

Also at AO3: "Broken Silence"



#


Like every other room in the Diogenes Club, the dining chamber is a place of calm. It is not silent, of course, but the rattle of knife and fork, the gentle chime of polished crystal, the sizzle of hot beef against cast-iron serving platters – these are noises of comfort and solace that can only be truly appreciated when the chatter of speech has been entirely set aside in their favor.

That peace was shattered early in the summer of 1891, when Dr. John Watson stormed through the dining room’s entrance and strode to stand over my table with an expression of grim fury upon his face.

“You have not, I trust, ordered the murder of your own brother,” he said, his tone one of barely restrained thunder. “But if you do not supply me at once with the truth of the matter, that is the charge I shall levy against you in the public press. The American press,” he added, folding his arms against his chest, “beyond the reach of even your vast influence.”

Two of the club’s men-at-arms had followed Watson into the room and now stood ready behind him, awaiting only a gesture from me to escort him forcibly from the premises. Instead, I shook my head slightly, levered myself to my feet – and, for the first and only time since the founding of the Diogenes, broke the club’s most cardinal rule. “Come,” I said, “and we shall discuss the matter.”

#


Such public accounts as one may find of the Diogenes Club’s inner workings – not least Dr. Watson’s own words – state that the Strangers’ Room is the only chamber on its premises wherein speech is tolerated. As a moment’s thought will surely indicate, this is not precisely accurate. Safety and efficiency preclude enforcement of such a rule amongst the chefs who prepare our members’ meals. The Diogenes’ butler-in-chief is necessarily free to give verbal orders and instructions within the walls of his own office. And the private board-room in which our executive committee gathers – albeit infrequently – to deliberate over such administrative or disciplinary matters as may arise is likewise exempt from the code of silence. It was to this last chamber that I led Dr. Watson in the wake of his outburst, having instructed the staff that we were not to be disturbed.

“I grant,” I told Watson, as we sat facing one another across the polished oaken conference table, “that I have much to answer for with regard to recent events. However, before we return to the matter of fratricide, perhaps you might summarize your own knowledge and understanding of those events. I shall then be better able to address your concerns – which are, I acknowledge, entirely warranted in the circumstances.”

Watson’s expression grew only slightly less icy. “With benefit of hindsight, three things should have been clear at once. First, that you and not Moriarty were the true ‘Napoleon of crime’ – though to what purpose, I can scarcely imagine. Second, that you planned from the first that Sherlock should seek out and bring down the organization Moriarty supposedly led. And third, that whatever else this bizarre fiction was meant to accomplish, one of its purposes was specifically to remove me from your brother’s side.”

I bowed my head. “The charges are soundly framed. Would you care to elaborate as to any of the particulars?”

“As you wish,” the doctor said coldly. “On reflection, the matter of Moriarty’s supposed intellect is obvious. Were there truly a third mind in England the equal of yours and Sherlock’s, and were its owner to adopt the career of criminal mastermind, an active conflict among the three of you should have arisen long before now – and been quickly settled to Moriarty’s detriment, for you and your brother would surely have joined forces to bring down such an opponent. Only one adversary exists against whom Sherlock could not have obtained your aid in a battle of thrust-and-parry such as he described to me, and that man is you.”

“I admit it,” I said. “Pray continue.”

Watson gave a slight nod. “The facts now give way to a degree of speculation. Whatever Moriarty may have thought, your purpose in sponsoring him cannot have been criminal in nature. Sherlock surely saw your hand behind the Professor’s well before I did, and had he believed you an evil genius, he would neither have approached you to aid his flight to the Continent nor sought my companionship without revealing the true risk. Indeed, I must conclude that our European adventure was as much your plan as his.”

“It was.”

After a brief silence, Watson spoke again. “I see. And what of the outcome of that adventure?”

I took a moment to compose myself. “You are dissatisfied with the official verdict.”

Watson bristled. “It is wholly unsupportable except as fiction. If Moriarty was your pawn, and Sherlock your willing ally, arranging a death-duel between them would be wasteful and unnecessary. Yet we are meant to believe that such a duel occurred, and that both combatants perished. If that is true, you have been unconscionably careless with your brother’s life. If it is not—”

“Then your trust has been unconscionably betrayed,” I said. “I shall not attempt to excuse my actions – but if you permit it, I shall offer such explanations as I can.”

For the first time, the doctor’s face grew visibly lighter. “If the first of those explanations is that Sherlock Holmes is alive, I am ready to listen.”

“It is,” I said at once, “although that must remain secret for some time to come.”

Watson’s eyebrows went up. “A matter of espionage, is it?”

“Several, in fact. The original Moriarty organization was indeed a criminal enterprise, but for some time now it has served chiefly to conceal the Government’s investigation of foreign agents within England’s borders. We have caught a good many such, but within the last year evidence of a leak began to emerge. I soon identified its source: Colonel Sebastian Moran, the Professor’s chief lieutenant. The only way to neutralize this threat was to shut down the Professor’s operations, and to do so in such a way that Moran would not suspect our purpose. I therefore arranged to set Sherlock on Moriarty’s track – but I could only do so indirectly, for Moran knew I was the Professor’s silent overseer. So long as he thought Sherlock to be interested only in Moriarty’s ‘criminal’ endeavors, he could consider his own treacherous dealings safe from discovery.”

“Whereas if Moran believed you and Sherlock to be working together, it could only be against him.”

“Precisely,” I said.

“And our flight to the Continent?” Watson inquired.

“With the Professor’s operations ended, Moran could not reasonably remain in England,” I explained. “Yet the needs of espionage are such that he is more useful alive than dead. The Colonel still believes himself a trusted British agent – and as such, by controlling the information he receives, we can control that which our enemies receive through him.” I paused. “And now we reach the heart of the matter.”

Slowly, the doctor nodded. “I begin to see, I think. To the Colonel, a living Sherlock Holmes would be a double threat – first as Moriarty’s one-time lieutenant, and second for what he might share with you.”

“Indeed, “ I said. “Also, there is much good Sherlock can do in the wider world, on England’s behalf and his own, under the cloak of some other identity. It is by no means a permanent exile, but at present it is necessary.”

Watson let out a sigh. “I cannot approve of the deceptions practiced upon me in the course of this affair. I would willingly have accepted—”

“Your loyalty is admirable,” I interjected, “but impractical. You cannot adopt and shed personas as easily as Sherlock does – and it would have been most unpleasant to bring news of your death, whether real or fictional, to Mrs. Watson.”

“True enough,” Watson said. “Very well, then; the game is yours.”

I could not prevent a short bark of laughter from escaping my lips. “Indeed not; the game is and will always be Sherlock’s, for it is he who both sets and breaks its rules.” Rising with some effort from my chair, I opened a cabinet and removed two glasses and a decanter. “Will you accept a touch of brandy, against the day of his return?”

He did. And as we drank together, the peaceful silence of the Diogenes Club reasserted itself around us.

# # #

Date: 2016-06-01 02:36 pm (UTC)
ancientreader: sebastian stan as bucky looking pensive (Default)
From: [personal profile] ancientreader
My God, this is ~fiendishly~ clever. And pitch-perfect in tone!

Date: 2016-06-24 09:25 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Shadow on asphalt (bug)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
Thank you! I definitely enjoyed writing this, and I like to think I have a decent ear for the various chroniclers one sees in the various Holmesian manuscripts. (Mycroft, obviously, is not Watson, but one still requires a certain period sense....)

Date: 2016-06-01 03:05 pm (UTC)
swissmarg: Mrs Hudson (Default)
From: [personal profile] swissmarg
What a devious interpretation! I love that it's still possible to take these situations we know so well and still turn them over so that they become fresh and insightful. Clever Watson as well!

Date: 2016-06-24 09:28 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Carmen Sandiego (carmen sandiego)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
Thank you! I admit to a certain fondness for working out off-the-wall AUs that nonetheless spring organically from canon. And I have always approved of Watsonian cleverness.

Date: 2016-06-01 06:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laurose8.livejournal.com
A good (and canonesque) explication, in a very good Mycroft voice.

Date: 2016-06-24 09:31 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Shadow on asphalt (Default)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
Thank you! It's always a challenge to replicate the particular tone of a source canon -- and in this case, it's a little trickier than usual, because most of Conan Doyle is in Watson's voice, and Mycroft's comes from a somewhat different perspective. I'm glad that most of the readers here felt comfortable with the results.

Date: 2016-06-01 09:27 pm (UTC)
ext_1620665: knight on horseback (Default)
From: [identity profile] scfrankles.livejournal.com
Your story is full of such brilliant and intriguing ideas. And your writing is so wonderful - I loved the description of the sounds of the dining room in the opening paragraph.

Date: 2016-06-24 09:33 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Carmen Sandiego (carmen sandiego)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
Thank you! And heh. Of course Mycroft is going to start a manuscript with a discussion of dinner....

Date: 2016-06-02 01:27 am (UTC)
methylviolet10b: a variety of different pocketwatches (Default)
From: [personal profile] methylviolet10b
How utterly splendid! I love your characterizations and your novel take on the Hiatus. I particularly enjoyed your Mycroft; you clearly share some of the same genius traits. Well done!

Date: 2016-06-24 09:36 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Shadow on asphalt (Default)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
Thank you! OTOH, I don't know that I deserve quite that much flattery; I am surely not in Mycroft's league. Wile E. Coyote's, now.... :-)

Date: 2016-06-02 02:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mundungus42.livejournal.com
This is just brilliant! A bold and brilliantly conceived take on post-FINA Watson, all through a delicious Mycroft POV. This is exquisitely written--the first paragraph is an aural marvel and beautifully illustrates Mycroft's attachment to the club and its unique comforts. I think your choice to tell this from Mycroft's POV may be my favorite aspect of the story, because of course Watson would have been far too humble to write his own brilliant deductions into canon. Plus, you know. State secrets. :D I loved every word. Bravissimo/a!!!!

Date: 2016-06-24 09:47 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Carmen Sandiego (carmen sandiego)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
[fans self] Flattery, flattery. Yes, this pretty much needed to be Mycroft's story -- partly because Watson would indeed have kept the implicit diplomatic secrets Mycroft hints at here, and partly because I don't think Watson here quite recognizes the degree to which Mycroft both has and hasn't anticipated Watson's own role in events as they've unfolded. He's observant, certainly -- but he knows Sherlock much better than he knows Mycroft, and that matters in the present case.

Thank you!

Date: 2016-06-02 02:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meredydd.livejournal.com
ANON AUTHOR! THANK YOU! This is perfect!

I read it the first time without blinking, the second time I read it agog, and this third pass, I finally remembered to comment, lol.



You seem to have nailed the characters perfectly. I love the plot and am thrilled you gifted this to my request! Thank you!

Date: 2016-06-24 09:49 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Shadow on asphalt (bug)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
[beam]

You're very welcome indeed. Looking over the story just after posting, I wondered a bit if I'd strayed a little too far from the center of your signup prompts, so I'm really pleased that you liked this.

Date: 2016-06-02 02:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rachelindeed.livejournal.com
Wow -- just when you think there can't be an angle to the Reichenbach story that you haven't seen before, here it comes! What a wonderfully insightful piece. Like Frankles mentioned above, I thought the early descriptions of the Diogenes were particularly lovely. I also really liked this little exchange:

“If the first of those explanations is that Sherlock Holmes is alive, I am ready to listen.”

“It is,” I said at once...


That's just so sweet, somehow. I have a very strong preference for Reichenbach stories that figure out a way for Watson to be in the know rather than left to grieve. I love how you managed it here!

Watson's intelligence shone through, and watching him lay out those relentlessly logical chains based on canon details that I had never stopped to observe was so satisfying! Especially since Mycroft was so very calm about it all, listening with something of the air of a schoolmaster. I also liked that the only point on which he corrected Watson was regarding which brother was truly in charge of these mad schemes. It's always Sherlock, isn't it? Mycroft follows him as much as Watson does, in his own way.

This was a lovely, clever revision of ACD canon. I loved reading it, thanks so much for sharing it!

Editing to add: Oh, I just noticed the double meaning of the title, paralleling the silence of the Diogenes with the far more weighty silence of secrecy surrounding Sherlock's survival. Both thoroughly needed breaking! Another example of ingenious storytelling from start to finish :)
Edited Date: 2016-06-02 02:22 am (UTC)

Date: 2016-06-24 10:03 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Carmen Sandiego (carmen sandiego)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
Thank you! I was instantly bemused when the reveal went up and I discovered we'd both written Mycroft-centric stories, with distinctly different takes on the character. And yet I think we both found ways to civilize him a bit from the "Machiavelli" versions that have become more and more common on the professional side of Holmesian storytelling.

Also, that's an extremely cogent observation on the title...which proves in the present case that my subconscious is smarter than I am. In the majority of cases I have a title in mind very early in my writing process, but this time out the title showed up at very nearly the last moment before I actually sent off the completed story. And so while you're totally on target in noting the parallel meanings, I was not consciously thinking about the silence-of-secrecy aspect when I typed the words into my Word document.

[Oddly enough, that sort of thing happens from time to time in the actual writing-stage too; I will come to a point in a manuscript where I need Something to happen, and I will only then realize that I've written something several paragraphs or pages earlier that totally sets up exactly the Something I need.]

Date: 2016-06-02 03:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gardnerhill.livejournal.com
Now that's a new interpretation of the events. Well done! I do love a sharper-than-he-lets-on Watson confronting Mycroft.

Date: 2016-06-24 08:40 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Carmen Sandiego (carmen sandiego)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
Thank you! This story required a good bit of tap-dancing around the canon in order to finesse Moriarty's true nature without entirely defanging him, so I'm glad that aspect of the speculation passed muster. And I'm definitely among those who prefer sharp!Watson to the Nigel Bruce persona.

Date: 2016-06-02 11:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saki101.livejournal.com
Oh, this is lovely and satisfying! Their interaction is perfect, the reasoning perfect and it is good to think of John knowing about Sherlock's survival long before he can return.

Date: 2016-06-24 08:46 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Shadow on asphalt (Default)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
Thank you! In realistic terms, Doyle obviously never gave much thought about the problem of having created *both* a "Napoleon of crime" in Moriarty and a near-perfect intellect in Mycroft...but then, both make very few appearances in the Canon proper. It's only having so many more stories in which each one features nowadays that brings the inherent conflict to greater notice.

Date: 2016-06-03 06:13 am (UTC)
venusinthenight: joan watson listening to sherlock (elementary - joan sits and listens)
From: [personal profile] venusinthenight
Oooooooh! Plot twist! :D Very, very clever for sure!

Date: 2016-06-24 08:49 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Carmen Sandiego (carmen sandiego)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
Thank you! Clever, perhaps, but more or less inevitable if one takes the Canon descriptions of Moriarty and Mycroft -- thin as they are -- as wholly accurate.

Date: 2016-06-04 07:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thesmallhobbit.livejournal.com
What a splendid re-telling. I like all the thought behind it, both by Mycroft, and by you, Anon. I especially liked the reasoning behind it would have been most unpleasant to bring news of your death, whether real or fictional, to Mrs. Watson

Date: 2016-06-24 08:55 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Carmen Sandiego (carmen sandiego)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
Thank you!

I've noted upstream that the internal logic of this story is more or less a necessary conclusion if one takes Doyle's canon descriptions as given. At the same time, though, I didn't want to make Mycroft quite as cold-blooded as (for instance) Laurie R. King's in the Mary Russell novels. Just as Sherlock was always a proper gentleman where his female clients were concerned, Mycroft would be considerate of Mary Watson's place in events -- and, in more practical fashion, reluctant to deploy Watson (however willing he might be) as a relatively untrained pawn in the Great Game.

Date: 2016-06-05 05:41 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Shadow on asphalt (Default)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
Interesting to see two tales from Mycroft's POV this round -- very similar in some ways, very different in others, yet both closely grounded in the source material. Now I need to go back and re-read the early Hodel/Wright Mycroft pastiche (and also to actually read the new one from Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, which has been sitting on my Nook for the last month or so).

Date: 2016-06-20 04:26 pm (UTC)
sanguinity: woodcut by M.C. Escher, "Snakes" (Default)
From: [personal profile] sanguinity
FYI, I have been cracking up over this comment for a week and a half now. :-D

Date: 2016-06-20 05:04 pm (UTC)
graycardinal: Shadow on asphalt (Default)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
Clearly I'm doing a superior job of entertaining you...and failing utterly at the sneakiness thing.

[Note to self: resist temptation to comment on own story next round. You will only end up playing Bullwinkle to [livejournal.com profile] sanguinity's Rocky: i.e. "Again? That trick never works!"]

Date: 2016-06-20 05:25 pm (UTC)
sanguinity: woodcut by M.C. Escher, "Snakes" (Default)
From: [personal profile] sanguinity
Heh. I'm in the habit of reading your comments when I see them. (You have a very warm, sincere, and free-flowing style, and they give me a little burst of pleasure even when they're for someone else entirely.) I read this one, all unsuspecting, and then I frowned at it for a while, trying to figure out what great and terrible offense the author had committed that you couldn't bring yourself to do anything more than ramble abstractly about your reading list and someone else's story. It is just so not your style.

But then it all came clear. :-D

And I'll be very interested to hear what you think about the Kareem Abdul-Jabbar pastiche, when you get there. Unless, of course, you're planning to read it sneakily, against the possibility of a future match.

Date: 2016-06-24 09:15 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Shadow on asphalt (bug)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
A further post-reveal note: it occurred to me after I'd finished and posted this that it might well be attributable to me entirely on the basis of its plot...because, in effect, it might be seen as an account of a matter I referred to obliquely in A Matter of Memoirs in the round before last.

(In practice, this iteration of Mycroft is arguably a good bit more civilized than King's, so that the Russellverse version of the present manuscript -- if there were one -- would probably vary somewhat from what's given here. More to the point, the Russellverse Moriarty was almost certainly never a pawn of Mycroft's. But you see why I was worried....)

Meanwhile, I have in fact now mainlined the KA-J pastiche, which is...interesting. (And clearly I really do now need to revisit the Hodel/Wright, which also involves a much younger Mycroft.) On one hand, it's much less over-the-top than I initially expected; OTOH, I'm not at all sure I see a viable path from this Mycroft to that of "Greek Interpreter" without rather more tragedy than the ending of the initial book (and, by implication, the overall tenor of the series) gives us. The authors have Mycroft's intellectual powers very well defined, but not (as yet, at least) the utter insularity that defines him in Conan Doyle.

Date: 2016-06-06 10:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] write-out.livejournal.com
This is a fantastic spin on the Fall! I greatly enjoyed Mycroft's POV here and loved the back and forth between him and Watson. Thanks for sharing such an excellent story!

Date: 2016-06-24 09:17 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Shadow on asphalt (martha)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
Thank you! (And much love for your icon from a childhood reader of just that vintage of the Nancy Drew books.) I very much enjoyed bringing Watson and Mycroft together here, and I'm very pleased that it's been so well received.

Date: 2016-06-21 04:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mistyzeo.livejournal.com
I am SO! Glad! That this is a possible explanation for that whole debacle.

Date: 2016-06-24 09:22 am (UTC)
graycardinal: Carmen Sandiego (carmen sandiego)
From: [personal profile] graycardinal
Thank you! The more I think about it, the more I think that whatever "really" happened offstage -- to the extent that Conan Doyle might have worked it out -- Mycroft had to have had more of a part than was ever hinted at in the Canon. There's just no way that a genuine Napoleon-of-Crime Moriarty would have been able to stay under Mycroft's radar...and if he didn't, then, well, we get something like the above bit of speculation.

April 2026

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 9th, 2026 12:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios